�I'm happy to report that we have settled our dispute,� Comwave president and founder Yuval Barzakay said. �Both parties worked hard and diligently to make sure the deal was closed prior to the launch.� Apple Canada representatives declined to comment on the issue.
This was the second dispute Apple has settled regarding the iPhone name. In February 2007, just over a month after Apple CEO Steve Jobs announced the iPhone, Apple settled a dispute with Cisco Systems, which was using the iPhone name to promote its own web-based home-phone service in the U.S.
Comwave used the iPhone brand first in Canada, but more and more, customers were identifying the term with Apple's product. �One of the things that we have always said about the trademark is that whenever you have a very large enterprise like Apple and they put in $20-million to $30-million a quarter into advertising, it doesn't matter whose name it is, eventually they will own it,� Barzakay said.
�It's all about perception. There are hundreds of thousands of Canadians who have been exposed to our iPhone over the course of a few years, but within a very short time, the hysteria on the Apple iPhone has almost caused what I call reverse confusion, in that the perception is that the iPhone name was Apple's and not Comwave's. That is something that we wanted to make clear,� he said.
While the first iteration of the Apple iPhone was a US-based product, it received global attention, with constant rumors of a Canadian arrival. Eventually, Canadian telecom giant Rogers agreed to distribute the phone in Canada, leading to Comwave's filing against Apple's use of the iPhone name.
�They were aware of us and I guess it was just a matter of whether or not they took us seriously,� Barzakay said. �I think in due time they did, and realized that they weren't able to trample over Canadian industry and that an amicable solution would have to come out of it.�
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar